Organizations are striving to establish this balance. Part of this process is to standardize the practice of creating a written pre-read for meetings - so everyone has a better sense of what will be covered and who actually needs to be present - and to share all non-sensitive material covered in the meeting with everyone in the organization..
The goal is to ensure that real-time meetings can be turned into searchable, skimmable data that teams can access at their own pace and people can get back more time to be more productive,” Teper says. “Instead of sitting in that meeting for an hour, I can get up to speed in five minutes.”
Level up real-time meetings with the power of asynchronous tools
Organizations can boost efficiency by developing a better sense of when real-time collaboration is essential and when it isn’t.
It’s incumbent upon leaders to help everyone establish a better balance between time spent in video conferences and time spent collaborating asynchronously.
Naturally, creating these asynchronous resources can mean extra work, but the goal is to eventually use AI to create a summary and identify key takeaways.
There are already many asynchronous tools that can be connected into the flow of work to further boost productivity. All of these tools can help make meetings more efficient and more useful. Sometimes, asynchronous communication can replace a meeting entirely—for instance, a status update can happen in a Teams channel instead of a video conference. It adds flexibility, and it creates a permanent searchable record.
Create norms that work best for your team
Every team will need to experiment to discover how to communicate and collaborate best, then create norms that support those discoveries. For instance, a “no emails allowed” mandate may not be effective company-wide, but if a team is expected to keep all of a project’s files, messages, and other collateral confined within a Microsoft Teams channel, workers are likely to continue to support those expectations when they see the benefit this coordination provides.
There’s also the question of delay. Just how asynchronous should asynchronous communication be? If someone’s at lunch and doesn’t respond to an email for an hour, a project can get held up and frustrations can arise as the other person feels they’re being ignored. Those issues are exacerbated when a team is spread around the globe. Time zone incompatibilities can introduce enormous lag into even the simplest of asynchronous discussions.
Why does this matter? Psychologically, if a worker receives a message from a co-worker or their boss after hours, they generally feel compelled to respond.
Asynchronous communication may never become perfect. We can’t get rid of time zones, but as we begin to think more intentionally about the temporal aspect of work, it's instrumental that asynchronous tools get richer, unlocking opportunities for organizations and individuals to reduce communication and cultural gaps, and establishing hybrid and virtual settings as their own entities, and not just a emergency replacement of a face-to-face setting.